The judge sided with states who argued that the expected border influx would impose costs on them for services for newcomers, such as health care and education, which the government should have paid for. account.
“These costs are not recoverable,” the judge wrote. “The requesting states thus satisfy the irreparable harm requirement for a preliminary injunction.”
He noted that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which originally issued the order, had not submitted their plan to terminate the order for public comment, which would have raised concerns from states – a likely violation. administrative procedure law. He said the government could have considered states’ concerns and perhaps devised an alternative to its “comprehensive” order ending Title 42.
National scale The preliminary injunction is a blow to President Biden’s promise to reopen borders, and it means the Department of Homeland Security should continue deporting migrants as the trial progresses through the courts. But the decision also offers the White House some respite from border-related political pressures ahead of November’s midterm elections, when Democrats risk losing their tight grip on the House and Senate.
The decision by Summerhays, a Trump appointee, delivered a victory for Republican attorneys general who had filed a lawsuit to stop the Biden administration from reversing Trump administration policy.
“BIG victory for the rule of law today,” said Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, one of the plaintiffs, tweeted after the decision. In a video, he said the Title 42 ordinance is “one of the last tools we have left in our toolbox” to stop an even greater influx of unauthorized immigrants.
Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley said the government would appeal the decision and that the CDC had legally determined that the current pandemic conditions made mass evictions unnecessary.
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said the administration “does not agree with the court’s decision” but will continue to enforce Title 42 until appealed.
“This means that migrants who attempt to enter the United States illegally will be subject to deportation under Title 42,” she said in a statement. She said migrants could also be officially deported if they cannot be deported.
The American Civil Liberties Union, which has filed lawsuits challenging the order, warned that the government’s power to deport migrants is not absolute, citing a US Court of Appeals ruling for the District of Columbia Circuit, which takes effect Monday, which prohibits the government from deporting migrant families to countries where they could face persecution. The government will first have to screen the families.
“The ruling is flawed and we assume and expect the administration to take immediate action to rescind the injunction,” ACLU attorney Lee Gelernt said. “The states that filed the lawsuit are only hypocritically concerned about the COVID restrictions when it comes to asylum seekers.”
Title 42 is shorthand for an emergency public health order the CDC originally issued in March 2020 to quickly deport unauthorized migrants even as President Donald Trump downplayed the virus ravaging the United States. . Biden rejected Trump’s anti-immigration agenda, but his administration maintained Title 42 for so long it ended up deporting migrants more times than its predecessor.
Nearly 2 million migrants have been deported under Title 42 since the order began, according to federal records — less than half a million under Trump. The order applies to migrants who attempt to illegally enter the United States from Canada or Mexico.
The CDC decided to lift the emergency public health order on April 1 after growing calls from Democratic leaders and skepticism that it served public health purposes, especially in high-density GOP states where opposition to mask mandates and vaccines has allowed the virus to spread easily.
Republican attorneys general in more than 20 states, led by Louisiana, Missouri and Arizona, quickly sued the administration to stop the override, saying in court records that Title 42 was “the only safety valve preventing this administration’s already disastrous border control policies from descending into absolute disaster.
Summerhays, who issued a temporary restraining order last month ordering the Biden administration to avoid suspending Title 42 until it can make a decision, presided over a hearing a week ago at the during which both parties presented their arguments.
Arizona Deputy Solicitor General Drew Ensign said in that hearing that the CDC should have taken public comment, one of many possible violations of the Administrative Procedure Act, when it decided to cancel title 42.
“They look at the pandemic as a general purpose, no-commentary card that can be used for any covid regulations, and that’s just not the case,” Ensign said.
But federal officials said the fluid nature of the emergency did not necessitate a public comment period and that the availability of vaccines, medical treatment and safety equipment had allowed normal operations to be restored.
The deportation of migrants simply created a revolving door at the border, officials said, sending people back to crime-ridden Mexican border towns to try to re-enter the United States. Officials said they plan to process asylum seekers and quickly deport or criminally prosecute other migrants who entered the United States illegally, a system they say worked well before Trump shut down. the border.
For example, nearly 30% of migrants apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol since Trump imposed Title 42 in fiscal year 2020 had previously attempted to cross illegally, a recidivism rate much higher than in 2016. the last year of the Obama administration, when it was 12 percent.
Title 42 “disrupts the treatment of immigration laws that Congress has enacted,” Justice Department attorney Jean Lin said during the May 13 hearing. She said lawmakers never intended a rarely used emergency health provision, such as Title 42, to turn into an immigration policy and that the ordinance “should end as soon as possible.”
What is Title 42? Explaining controversial Trump-era border politics.
Authorities are currently making 7,000 to 8,000 border arrests a day, but the Department of Homeland Security had estimated the number could rise to 18,000 after Title 42 is lifted. US Customs and Border Protection United States made more than 1.47 million immigrant arrests in the first seven months of fiscal year 2022, which began in October, and about 87 percent of arrests took place at the U.S.- mexican.
CBP is expected to surpass last year’s record 1.73 million arrests at the Southwest Border, part of nearly 2 million arrests nationwide.
Immigrant advocates say they are fleeing pandemic-ravaged economies and should be allowed into the country to plead their case, especially at a time when many states are experiencing labor shortages.
In a court filing, a migrant family from El Salvador turned away under Title 42 say they fled death threats from gang members and had been waiting for months in northern Mexico to seek release. asylum, even though she had US citizen relatives in California waiting to take them in. .
“I’m very sad and frustrated because all we want is to ask for protection from our family,” Alicia De Los Angeles Duran Raymundo, 23, from Cuscatlan, El Salvador, with her partner, Kevin De León, and her 6-year-eldest daughter, said in an affidavit. “We are not safe in our country or in Mexico.”
Democrats such as Senate Majority Leader Charles E. Schumer (NY) and Senator Robert Menendez (DN.J.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, had called on the Biden administration to end the title 42, but other Democrats such as Arizona’s Sens Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema and Rep. Henry Cuellar (Texas) have said he should stay in place.
On Friday, Cuellar praised the decision on Twitter.
“The judge’s decision to block the termination of Title 42 is great news for border communities,” he said. wrote. “I look forward to continuing this conversation as the pandemic progresses.”
Caroline Savoie contributed to this report.